Azure Database for MySQL vs CockroachDB

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database meets the cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at sql. Here's our take.

Azure Database for MySQL

Nice Pick

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

• Fully managed with automated backups and patching
• High availability built-in with flexible server options
• Seamless integration with other Azure services
• Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

• Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
• Limited control over underlying infrastructure

CockroachDB

The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.

Pros

• Strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding
• PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility for easy migration
• Automatic data replication and rebalancing for high availability

Cons

• Higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead
• Complex licensing and pricing can be a headache for scaling

The Verdict

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You want fully managed with automated backups and patching and can live with can get pricey compared to self-hosted mysql.

Use CockroachDB if: You prioritize strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding over what Azure Database for MySQL offers.

The Bottom Line

Azure Database for MySQL wins

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.