ActivityPub vs Proprietary APIs

Developers should learn ActivityPub when building or integrating social features that require decentralization, privacy, or resistance to censorship, as it allows creating platforms that can interact with others like Mastodon or PeerTube meets developers should learn about proprietary apis when building applications that integrate with specific commercial platforms, such as social media services (e. Here's our take.

ActivityPub

Nice Pick

Developers should learn ActivityPub when building or integrating social features that require decentralization, privacy, or resistance to censorship, as it allows creating platforms that can interact with others like Mastodon or PeerTube

Pros

• It's essential for projects aiming to avoid centralized control, such as community-run social networks, academic collaborations, or privacy-focused applications, enabling users to own their data and choose their hosting providers
• Related to: mastodon, fediverse

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Proprietary APIs

Developers should learn about proprietary APIs when building applications that integrate with specific commercial platforms, such as social media services (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: api-design, authentication

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. ActivityPub is a protocol while Proprietary APIs is a concept. We picked ActivityPub based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

ActivityPub wins

Based on overall popularity. ActivityPub is more widely used, but Proprietary APIs excels in its own space.