Accessibility ARIA vs Native HTML Semantics

Developers should learn and use ARIA when building interactive web applications with complex UI components (e meets developers should use native html semantics to create accessible and well-structured web pages that work effectively with screen readers and other assistive tools, improving user experience for people with disabilities. Here's our take.

Accessibility ARIA

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use ARIA when building interactive web applications with complex UI components (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: html-semantics, web-accessibility

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Native HTML Semantics

Developers should use native HTML semantics to create accessible and well-structured web pages that work effectively with screen readers and other assistive tools, improving user experience for people with disabilities

Pros

• It also boosts search engine optimization by helping crawlers understand page content, and it simplifies styling and maintenance through cleaner, more meaningful markup
• Related to: html5, accessibility

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Accessibility ARIA if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Native HTML Semantics if: You prioritize it also boosts search engine optimization by helping crawlers understand page content, and it simplifies styling and maintenance through cleaner, more meaningful markup over what Accessibility ARIA offers.

The Bottom Line

Accessibility ARIA wins

Developers should learn and use ARIA when building interactive web applications with complex UI components (e