Accessibility Audits vs Automated Accessibility Testing

Developers should learn and conduct accessibility audits to ensure their products are inclusive and legally compliant, as many regions have laws requiring digital accessibility (e meets developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e. Here's our take.

Accessibility Audits

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and conduct accessibility audits to ensure their products are inclusive and legally compliant, as many regions have laws requiring digital accessibility (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Automated Accessibility Testing

Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-compliance

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Accessibility Audits if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Automated Accessibility Testing if: You prioritize g over what Accessibility Audits offers.

The Bottom Line

Accessibility Audits wins

Developers should learn and conduct accessibility audits to ensure their products are inclusive and legally compliant, as many regions have laws requiring digital accessibility (e