Accessibility Development vs Non-Accessible Development

Developers should learn and use accessibility development to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should avoid non-accessible development as it can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and negative social impact, especially in regions with accessibility laws like the ada or wcag guidelines. Here's our take.

Accessibility Development

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use accessibility development to comply with legal requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, aria

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Non-Accessible Development

Developers should avoid non-accessible development as it can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and negative social impact, especially in regions with accessibility laws like the ADA or WCAG guidelines

Pros

• Instead, they should learn accessible development practices to create inclusive products that serve diverse user bases, improve SEO, and enhance overall usability
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-guidelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Accessibility Development is a concept while Non-Accessible Development is a methodology. We picked Accessibility Development based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Accessibility Development wins

Based on overall popularity. Accessibility Development is more widely used, but Non-Accessible Development excels in its own space.