Accessible Development vs Non-Accessible Development

Developers should learn and use Accessible Development to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should avoid non-accessible development as it can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and negative social impact, especially in regions with accessibility laws like the ada or wcag guidelines. Here's our take.

Accessible Development

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Accessible Development to comply with legal requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, semantic-html

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Non-Accessible Development

Developers should avoid non-accessible development as it can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and negative social impact, especially in regions with accessibility laws like the ADA or WCAG guidelines

Pros

• Instead, they should learn accessible development practices to create inclusive products that serve diverse user bases, improve SEO, and enhance overall usability
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-guidelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Accessible Development if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Non-Accessible Development if: You prioritize instead, they should learn accessible development practices to create inclusive products that serve diverse user bases, improve seo, and enhance overall usability over what Accessible Development offers.

The Bottom Line

Accessible Development wins

Developers should learn and use Accessible Development to comply with legal requirements (e