acme.sh vs Certbot

Developers should use acme meets developers should use certbot when they need to secure websites with https, especially for production environments where automated certificate management is crucial. Here's our take.

acme.sh

Nice Pick

Developers should use acme

Pros

• sh when they need an automated, lightweight solution for managing SSL/TLS certificates, especially in environments where minimal dependencies are preferred, such as embedded systems or containers
• Related to: lets-encrypt, ssl-tls

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Certbot

Developers should use Certbot when they need to secure websites with HTTPS, especially for production environments where automated certificate management is crucial

Pros

• It's ideal for web hosting, e-commerce sites, and any application requiring encrypted connections to protect user data and comply with security standards
• Related to: lets-encrypt, ssl-tls

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use acme.sh if: You want sh when they need an automated, lightweight solution for managing ssl/tls certificates, especially in environments where minimal dependencies are preferred, such as embedded systems or containers and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Certbot if: You prioritize it's ideal for web hosting, e-commerce sites, and any application requiring encrypted connections to protect user data and comply with security standards over what acme.sh offers.

The Bottom Line

acme.sh wins

Developers should use acme