Active-Passive vs Active-Active
Developers should learn and implement Active-Passive architectures when building systems that require high availability and disaster recovery, such as financial applications, e-commerce platforms, or critical infrastructure services meets developers should learn active-active for building resilient applications that require minimal downtime and high throughput, such as e-commerce platforms, financial services, or real-time data processing systems. Here's our take.
Active-Passive
Developers should learn and implement Active-Passive architectures when building systems that require high availability and disaster recovery, such as financial applications, e-commerce platforms, or critical infrastructure services
Active-Passive
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and implement Active-Passive architectures when building systems that require high availability and disaster recovery, such as financial applications, e-commerce platforms, or critical infrastructure services
Pros
- +It is particularly useful in scenarios where downtime is unacceptable, as it allows for seamless failover without service interruption, ensuring business continuity and data integrity
- +Related to: high-availability, fault-tolerance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Active-Active
Developers should learn Active-Active for building resilient applications that require minimal downtime and high throughput, such as e-commerce platforms, financial services, or real-time data processing systems
Pros
- +It is essential in scenarios where single points of failure are unacceptable, enabling automatic traffic redirection during failures and efficient resource utilization under varying loads
- +Related to: high-availability, load-balancing
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Active-Passive if: You want it is particularly useful in scenarios where downtime is unacceptable, as it allows for seamless failover without service interruption, ensuring business continuity and data integrity and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Active-Active if: You prioritize it is essential in scenarios where single points of failure are unacceptable, enabling automatic traffic redirection during failures and efficient resource utilization under varying loads over what Active-Passive offers.
Developers should learn and implement Active-Passive architectures when building systems that require high availability and disaster recovery, such as financial applications, e-commerce platforms, or critical infrastructure services
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev