Ad Hoc Compliance vs Continuous Compliance

Developers should understand Ad Hoc Compliance to recognize its pitfalls and transition to more robust compliance strategies, such as DevSecOps or continuous compliance, especially in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government meets developers should learn and implement continuous compliance when working in regulated industries (e. Here's our take.

Ad Hoc Compliance

Nice Pick

Developers should understand Ad Hoc Compliance to recognize its pitfalls and transition to more robust compliance strategies, such as DevSecOps or continuous compliance, especially in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government

Pros

• It is useful in early-stage projects or small teams where formal compliance processes are not yet established, but it should be avoided for long-term scalability and risk management due to its inefficiency and error-proneness
• Related to: devsecops, policy-as-code

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Continuous Compliance

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Ad Hoc Compliance if: You want it is useful in early-stage projects or small teams where formal compliance processes are not yet established, but it should be avoided for long-term scalability and risk management due to its inefficiency and error-proneness and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Continuous Compliance if: You prioritize g over what Ad Hoc Compliance offers.

The Bottom Line

Ad Hoc Compliance wins

Developers should understand Ad Hoc Compliance to recognize its pitfalls and transition to more robust compliance strategies, such as DevSecOps or continuous compliance, especially in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government