Ad Hoc Planning vs Waterfall Methodology
Developers should use ad hoc planning in situations where traditional, structured planning methods are impractical, such as during rapid prototyping, emergency bug fixes, or when working on small, short-term projects with unclear requirements meets developers should learn and use the waterfall methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly. Here's our take.
Ad Hoc Planning
Developers should use ad hoc planning in situations where traditional, structured planning methods are impractical, such as during rapid prototyping, emergency bug fixes, or when working on small, short-term projects with unclear requirements
Ad Hoc Planning
Nice PickDevelopers should use ad hoc planning in situations where traditional, structured planning methods are impractical, such as during rapid prototyping, emergency bug fixes, or when working on small, short-term projects with unclear requirements
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable in agile or startup environments where adaptability and speed are prioritized over comprehensive documentation and long-term forecasting, allowing teams to pivot quickly based on feedback or new information
- +Related to: agile-methodologies, scrum
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Waterfall Methodology
Developers should learn and use the Waterfall Methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly
Pros
- +It is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects
- +Related to: software-development-life-cycle, project-management
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Ad Hoc Planning if: You want it is particularly valuable in agile or startup environments where adaptability and speed are prioritized over comprehensive documentation and long-term forecasting, allowing teams to pivot quickly based on feedback or new information and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Waterfall Methodology if: You prioritize it is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects over what Ad Hoc Planning offers.
Developers should use ad hoc planning in situations where traditional, structured planning methods are impractical, such as during rapid prototyping, emergency bug fixes, or when working on small, short-term projects with unclear requirements
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev