Ad Hoc Scripting vs Low Code Platforms

Developers should use ad hoc scripting when they need to quickly automate repetitive tasks, debug issues, or perform one-off data analysis without investing time in full-scale software development meets developers should learn low code platforms to accelerate prototyping, automate repetitive tasks, and enable collaboration with business stakeholders who lack coding expertise. Here's our take.

Ad Hoc Scripting

Nice Pick

Developers should use ad hoc scripting when they need to quickly automate repetitive tasks, debug issues, or perform one-off data analysis without investing time in full-scale software development

Pros

• It's ideal for scenarios like log file parsing, batch file renaming, or testing APIs, where the focus is on immediate results rather than production-ready code
• Related to: python, bash

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Low Code Platforms

Developers should learn low code platforms to accelerate prototyping, automate repetitive tasks, and enable collaboration with business stakeholders who lack coding expertise

Pros

• They are particularly useful for building internal tools, business process applications, and MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) where speed and agility are prioritized over custom code
• Related to: business-process-automation, drag-and-drop-interfaces

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Ad Hoc Scripting is a methodology while Low Code Platforms is a platform. We picked Ad Hoc Scripting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Ad Hoc Scripting wins

Based on overall popularity. Ad Hoc Scripting is more widely used, but Low Code Platforms excels in its own space.