Adherence vs Technical Debt
Developers should prioritize adherence when working in regulated industries (e meets developers should understand technical debt to make informed decisions about when to incur it (e. Here's our take.
Adherence
Developers should prioritize adherence when working in regulated industries (e
Adherence
Nice PickDevelopers should prioritize adherence when working in regulated industries (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: code-review, agile-methodology
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Technical Debt
Developers should understand technical debt to make informed decisions about when to incur it (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: refactoring, code-quality
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Adherence is a methodology while Technical Debt is a concept. We picked Adherence based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Adherence is more widely used, but Technical Debt excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev