ADO.NET vs Dapper
Developers should learn ADO meets developers should use dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw sql control is preferred. Here's our take.
ADO.NET
Developers should learn ADO
ADO.NET
Nice PickDevelopers should learn ADO
Pros
- +NET when building
- +Related to: c-sharp, sql-server
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Dapper
Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred
Pros
- +It's ideal for projects requiring simple CRUD operations, complex queries, or when integrating with existing SQL-heavy codebases, as it reduces boilerplate while maintaining SQL transparency
- +Related to: c-sharp, sql-server
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. ADO.NET is a framework while Dapper is a library. We picked ADO.NET based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. ADO.NET is more widely used, but Dapper excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev