Ajax File Upload vs Uppy
Skip jQuery File Upload and Fine Uploader outright — one's GitHub-archived since April 2026 carrying a patched CVSS-9 meets developers should use uppy when building web applications that require robust, customizable file upload functionality, such as content management systems, social media platforms, or document-sharing tools. Here's our take.
Ajax File Upload
Skip jQuery File Upload and Fine Uploader outright — one's GitHub-archived since April 2026 carrying a patched CVSS-9
Ajax File Upload
Nice PickSkip jQuery File Upload and Fine Uploader outright — one's GitHub-archived since April 2026 carrying a patched CVSS-9
Pros
- +8 arbitrary-upload CVE, the other's been dead since 2018
- +Related to: fetch-api, xmlhttprequest
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Uppy
Developers should use Uppy when building web applications that require robust, customizable file upload functionality, such as content management systems, social media platforms, or document-sharing tools
Pros
- +It simplifies handling complex upload scenarios, including large files, multiple sources, and real-time progress updates, while being framework-agnostic and easy to integrate with backends
- +Related to: javascript, react
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Ajax File Upload is a concept while Uppy is a library. We picked Ajax File Upload based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Ajax File Upload is more widely used, but Uppy excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev