Dynamic

Ajax File Upload vs Uppy

Skip jQuery File Upload and Fine Uploader outright — one's GitHub-archived since April 2026 carrying a patched CVSS-9 meets developers should use uppy when building web applications that require robust, customizable file upload functionality, such as content management systems, social media platforms, or document-sharing tools. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Ajax File Upload

Skip jQuery File Upload and Fine Uploader outright — one's GitHub-archived since April 2026 carrying a patched CVSS-9

Ajax File Upload

Nice Pick

Skip jQuery File Upload and Fine Uploader outright — one's GitHub-archived since April 2026 carrying a patched CVSS-9

Pros

  • +8 arbitrary-upload CVE, the other's been dead since 2018
  • +Related to: fetch-api, xmlhttprequest

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Uppy

Developers should use Uppy when building web applications that require robust, customizable file upload functionality, such as content management systems, social media platforms, or document-sharing tools

Pros

  • +It simplifies handling complex upload scenarios, including large files, multiple sources, and real-time progress updates, while being framework-agnostic and easy to integrate with backends
  • +Related to: javascript, react

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Ajax File Upload is a concept while Uppy is a library. We picked Ajax File Upload based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Ajax File Upload wins

Based on overall popularity. Ajax File Upload is more widely used, but Uppy excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev