Amazon Aurora Serverless vs Amazon RDS

Developers should use Amazon Aurora Serverless for applications with unpredictable or variable database usage patterns, such as development and test environments, low-traffic applications, or applications with periodic spikes in demand meets developers should use amazon rds when building applications that require a managed relational database with high availability, automated backups, and easy scalability, reducing operational overhead. Here's our take.

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Nice Pick

Developers should use Amazon Aurora Serverless for applications with unpredictable or variable database usage patterns, such as development and test environments, low-traffic applications, or applications with periodic spikes in demand

Pros

• It is ideal when you want to avoid over-provisioning or under-provisioning database capacity, as it automatically scales to handle workload changes, reducing costs and operational overhead
• Related to: amazon-aurora, aws-rds

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Amazon RDS

Developers should use Amazon RDS when building applications that require a managed relational database with high availability, automated backups, and easy scalability, reducing operational overhead

Pros

• It is ideal for web applications, e-commerce platforms, and enterprise systems where database administration resources are limited or need to be optimized for cost and efficiency
• Related to: aws, mysql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Amazon Aurora Serverless is a database while Amazon RDS is a platform. We picked Amazon Aurora Serverless based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Amazon Aurora Serverless wins

Based on overall popularity. Amazon Aurora Serverless is more widely used, but Amazon RDS excels in its own space.