Amazon Aurora vs Azure Database for MySQL

AWS's database that makes you feel fancy without the price tag of Oracle, but still costs more than your rent meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.

Amazon Aurora

Nice Pick

AWS's database that makes you feel fancy without the price tag of Oracle, but still costs more than your rent.

Pros

• Fully managed with automatic scaling, backups, and patching
• Up to 5x MySQL and 3x PostgreSQL performance with cloud-optimized storage
• High availability and durability through multi-AZ replication
• MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility for easy migration

Cons

• Can get expensive quickly with scaling and I/O costs
• Vendor lock-in to AWS ecosystem
• Limited to AWS regions, which might affect latency for global apps

Azure Database for MySQL

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

• Fully managed with automated backups and patching
• High availability built-in with flexible server options
• Seamless integration with other Azure services
• Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

• Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
• Limited control over underlying infrastructure

The Verdict

Use Amazon Aurora if: You want fully managed with automatic scaling, backups, and patching and can live with can get expensive quickly with scaling and i/o costs.

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Amazon Aurora offers.

The Bottom Line

Amazon Aurora wins

AWS's database that makes you feel fancy without the price tag of Oracle, but still costs more than your rent.