Dynamic

Amazon DynamoDB vs DynamoDB

AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN meets aws's nosql powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Amazon DynamoDB

AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN.

Amazon DynamoDB

Nice Pick

AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automatic scaling and multi-AZ replication
  • +Single-digit millisecond latency for key-value operations
  • +Built-in security, backup, and in-memory caching with DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)

Cons

  • -Pricing model can get expensive with high throughput or large datasets
  • -Limited query flexibility compared to relational databases (no JOINs, complex queries)

DynamoDB

AWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes.

Pros

  • +Serverless architecture with automatic scaling
  • +Single-digit millisecond latency for most operations
  • +Built-in backup and point-in-time recovery
  • +Seamless integration with other AWS services

Cons

  • -Pricing can be unpredictable with high throughput
  • -Limited query flexibility compared to relational databases

The Verdict

Use Amazon DynamoDB if: You want fully managed with automatic scaling and multi-az replication and can live with pricing model can get expensive with high throughput or large datasets.

Use DynamoDB if: You prioritize serverless architecture with automatic scaling over what Amazon DynamoDB offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Amazon DynamoDB wins

AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev