Amazon DynamoDB vs DynamoDB
AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN meets aws's nosql powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes. Here's our take.
Amazon DynamoDB
AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN.
Amazon DynamoDB
Nice PickAWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automatic scaling and multi-AZ replication
- +Single-digit millisecond latency for key-value operations
- +Built-in security, backup, and in-memory caching with DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
Cons
- -Pricing model can get expensive with high throughput or large datasets
- -Limited query flexibility compared to relational databases (no JOINs, complex queries)
DynamoDB
AWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes.
Pros
- +Serverless architecture with automatic scaling
- +Single-digit millisecond latency for most operations
- +Built-in backup and point-in-time recovery
- +Seamless integration with other AWS services
Cons
- -Pricing can be unpredictable with high throughput
- -Limited query flexibility compared to relational databases
The Verdict
Use Amazon DynamoDB if: You want fully managed with automatic scaling and multi-az replication and can live with pricing model can get expensive with high throughput or large datasets.
Use DynamoDB if: You prioritize serverless architecture with automatic scaling over what Amazon DynamoDB offers.
AWS's NoSQL workhorse: scales like a dream, but you'll pay for every query and pray you never need a JOIN.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev