Amazon RDS for MySQL vs Amazon Aurora

Developers should use Amazon RDS for MySQL when building applications that require a reliable, scalable, and managed MySQL database without the overhead of manual administration meets developers should use amazon aurora when building cloud-native applications on aws that require high-performance, scalable, and reliable relational databases, such as for e-commerce platforms, saas applications, or data-intensive workloads. Here's our take.

Amazon RDS for MySQL

Nice Pick

Developers should use Amazon RDS for MySQL when building applications that require a reliable, scalable, and managed MySQL database without the overhead of manual administration

Pros

• It is ideal for web applications, e-commerce platforms, and data-driven services where high availability and automated backups are critical
• Related to: mysql, amazon-web-services

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Amazon Aurora

Developers should use Amazon Aurora when building cloud-native applications on AWS that require high-performance, scalable, and reliable relational databases, such as for e-commerce platforms, SaaS applications, or data-intensive workloads

Pros

• It is ideal for scenarios needing low-latency read replicas, automated failover, and integration with AWS services like Lambda or RDS Proxy, while reducing administrative overhead compared to self-managed databases
• Related to: mysql, postgresql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Amazon RDS for MySQL is a platform while Amazon Aurora is a database. We picked Amazon RDS for MySQL based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Amazon RDS for MySQL wins

Based on overall popularity. Amazon RDS for MySQL is more widely used, but Amazon Aurora excels in its own space.