AMPscript vs Liquid
Developers should learn AMPscript when working with Salesforce Marketing Cloud to build advanced, data-driven marketing automations that require personalization beyond basic merge fields meets developers should learn liquid when working with shopify or other platforms that use it, such as jekyll or other content management systems, to customize themes, build dynamic product pages, or implement logic in templates. Here's our take.
AMPscript
Developers should learn AMPscript when working with Salesforce Marketing Cloud to build advanced, data-driven marketing automations that require personalization beyond basic merge fields
AMPscript
Nice PickDevelopers should learn AMPscript when working with Salesforce Marketing Cloud to build advanced, data-driven marketing automations that require personalization beyond basic merge fields
Pros
- +It is essential for use cases like dynamic content insertion based on subscriber attributes, conditional logic for A/B testing, and integrating real-time data from Salesforce objects or external APIs into marketing communications
- +Related to: salesforce-marketing-cloud, email-marketing
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Liquid
Developers should learn Liquid when working with Shopify or other platforms that use it, such as Jekyll or other content management systems, to customize themes, build dynamic product pages, or implement logic in templates
Pros
- +It is essential for e-commerce development where personalized content, conditional displays, and data manipulation are required, offering a balance between flexibility and security by preventing arbitrary code execution
- +Related to: shopify, jekyll
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. AMPscript is a language while Liquid is a template language. We picked AMPscript based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. AMPscript is more widely used, but Liquid excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev