Dynamic

Android API Level 22 vs Android API Level 19

Developers should learn and use Android API Level 22 when building apps that need to support older devices running Android 5 meets developers should learn and target api level 19 when building apps that need to support older android devices, as it provides a balance between modern features and broad device compatibility. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Android API Level 22

Developers should learn and use Android API Level 22 when building apps that need to support older devices running Android 5

Android API Level 22

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Android API Level 22 when building apps that need to support older devices running Android 5

Pros

  • +1 Lollipop, as it represents a significant user base in legacy markets
  • +Related to: android-sdk, android-studio

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Android API Level 19

Developers should learn and target API Level 19 when building apps that need to support older Android devices, as it provides a balance between modern features and broad device compatibility

Pros

  • +It's particularly useful for apps targeting emerging markets or legacy hardware, and understanding its APIs helps in handling version-specific behaviors and deprecations in Android development
  • +Related to: android-sdk, android-studio

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Android API Level 22 if: You want 1 lollipop, as it represents a significant user base in legacy markets and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Android API Level 19 if: You prioritize it's particularly useful for apps targeting emerging markets or legacy hardware, and understanding its apis helps in handling version-specific behaviors and deprecations in android development over what Android API Level 22 offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Android API Level 22 wins

Developers should learn and use Android API Level 22 when building apps that need to support older devices running Android 5

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev