Android Biometric API vs Firebase Authentication

Developers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data meets developers should use firebase authentication when building applications that require secure user sign-up and login without managing complex authentication infrastructure. Here's our take.

Android Biometric API

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data

Pros

• It is essential for enhancing security and user convenience by replacing or supplementing traditional password-based logins with biometric methods
• Related to: android-development, kotlin

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Firebase Authentication

Developers should use Firebase Authentication when building applications that require secure user sign-up and login without managing complex authentication infrastructure

Pros

• It's ideal for rapid prototyping, mobile apps, and web applications where developer productivity and security are priorities, such as in startups or projects with limited backend resources
• Related to: firebase, google-cloud-platform

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Android Biometric API is a library while Firebase Authentication is a platform. We picked Android Biometric API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Android Biometric API wins

Based on overall popularity. Android Biometric API is more widely used, but Firebase Authentication excels in its own space.