Android Biometric API vs Keycloak

Developers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data meets developers should use keycloak when building applications that require robust security, centralized user management, and compliance with industry standards, such as in enterprise environments, microservices architectures, or cloud-native applications. Here's our take.

Android Biometric API

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data

Pros

• It is essential for enhancing security and user convenience by replacing or supplementing traditional password-based logins with biometric methods
• Related to: android-development, kotlin

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Keycloak

Developers should use Keycloak when building applications that require robust security, centralized user management, and compliance with industry standards, such as in enterprise environments, microservices architectures, or cloud-native applications

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for scenarios needing SSO across multiple services, integrating with external identity providers (e
• Related to: oauth-2.0, openid-connect

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Android Biometric API is a library while Keycloak is a platform. We picked Android Biometric API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Android Biometric API wins

Based on overall popularity. Android Biometric API is more widely used, but Keycloak excels in its own space.