Android Biometric API vs OAuth 2.0
Developers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data meets developers should learn oauth 2. Here's our take.
Android Biometric API
Developers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data
Android Biometric API
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use the Android Biometric API when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data
Pros
- +It is essential for enhancing security and user convenience by replacing or supplementing traditional password-based logins with biometric methods
- +Related to: android-development, kotlin
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
OAuth 2.0
Developers should learn OAuth 2
Pros
- +0 when building applications that need to integrate with external services like Google, Facebook, or GitHub, as it provides a standardized way to handle authentication and authorization
- +Related to: openid-connect, jwt
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Android Biometric API is a library while OAuth 2.0 is a concept. We picked Android Biometric API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Android Biometric API is more widely used, but OAuth 2.0 excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev