Animation vs Progressive Enhancement

Developers should learn animation to improve user interfaces by making them more intuitive and responsive, such as for loading indicators, page transitions, or interactive feedback meets developers should use progressive enhancement when building websites or applications that need to reach a broad audience, including users on older browsers, low-bandwidth connections, or assistive technologies. Here's our take.

Animation

Nice Pick

Developers should learn animation to improve user interfaces by making them more intuitive and responsive, such as for loading indicators, page transitions, or interactive feedback

Pros

• It is essential for creating modern, polished applications that meet user expectations for smooth interactions, particularly in front-end web development (e
• Related to: css-animations, javascript-animation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Progressive Enhancement

Developers should use Progressive Enhancement when building websites or applications that need to reach a broad audience, including users on older browsers, low-bandwidth connections, or assistive technologies

Pros

• It's crucial for ensuring accessibility compliance, improving SEO through semantic HTML, and creating robust applications that degrade gracefully when advanced features fail
• Related to: semantic-html, responsive-web-design

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Animation is a concept while Progressive Enhancement is a methodology. We picked Animation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Animation wins

Based on overall popularity. Animation is more widely used, but Progressive Enhancement excels in its own space.