Apache Shiro vs OAuth 2.0

Developers should use Apache Shiro when building Java applications that require robust security features without the complexity of Java EE security or Spring Security meets developers should learn oauth 2. Here's our take.

Apache Shiro

Nice Pick

Developers should use Apache Shiro when building Java applications that require robust security features without the complexity of Java EE security or Spring Security

Pros

• It's particularly useful for projects needing lightweight, flexible security solutions, such as web applications with custom authentication flows, REST APIs with token-based security, or legacy systems requiring security upgrades
• Related to: java, spring-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

OAuth 2.0

Developers should learn OAuth 2

Pros

• 0 when building applications that need to access user data from external services like Google, Facebook, or GitHub, as it provides a standardized and secure way to handle authorization without storing passwords
• Related to: openid-connect, jwt

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Apache Shiro is a framework while OAuth 2.0 is a concept. We picked Apache Shiro based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Apache Shiro wins

Based on overall popularity. Apache Shiro is more widely used, but OAuth 2.0 excels in its own space.