Apache vs Caddy
Classic powerhouse vs modern simplicity.
The short answer
Caddy over Apache for most cases. Caddy wins for most modern deployments.
- Pick Apache if need mod_* ecosystem, .htaccess per-directory overrides, or are maintaining legacy infrastructure
- Pick Caddy if want automatic HTTPS, a readable Caddyfile, and modern defaults without the config archaeology
- Also consider: nginx if you need maximum performance at scale and don't mind manual cert management.
— Nice Pick, opinionated tool recommendations
Configuration: Readable vs Archaeological
Caddy's Caddyfile is the headline feature: a few lines gets you a production site with automatic HTTPS. Apache's config sprawls across files, modules, and .htaccess overrides that compound into something only the person who wrote it understands. For most teams in 2026, Caddy's simplicity is worth more than Apache's infinite configurability.
HTTPS: Automatic vs Manual
Caddy provisions and renews TLS certificates automatically via ACME, zero config. Apache needs certbot, cron jobs, and vhost surgery. This single difference eliminates an entire category of 3am incidents.
Ecosystem and Legacy
Apache's mod_ ecosystem and decades of Stack Overflow answers are real. If you're running legacy PHP with .htaccess rules, Apache is the path of least resistance. Caddy's plugin ecosystem is younger but covers modern needs.
Quick Comparison
| Factor | Apache | Caddy |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic HTTPS | Manual (certbot) | Built-in |
| Config readability | Sprawling | Caddyfile |
| Legacy ecosystem | Vast | Growing |
The Verdict
Use Apache if: You need mod_* ecosystem, .htaccess per-directory overrides, or are maintaining legacy infrastructure.
Use Caddy if: You want automatic HTTPS, a readable Caddyfile, and modern defaults without the config archaeology.
Consider: nginx if you need maximum performance at scale and don't mind manual cert management.
Apache vs Caddy: FAQ
Is Apache or Caddy better?
Caddy is the Nice Pick. Caddy wins for most modern deployments. Automatic HTTPS out of the box, a config file a human can actually read, and sane defaults. Apache is the battle-tested giant but its configuration is a tax you pay forever.
When should you use Apache?
You need mod_* ecosystem, .htaccess per-directory overrides, or are maintaining legacy infrastructure.
When should you use Caddy?
You want automatic HTTPS, a readable Caddyfile, and modern defaults without the config archaeology.
What's the main difference between Apache and Caddy?
Classic powerhouse vs modern simplicity.
How do Apache and Caddy compare on automatic https?
Apache: Manual (certbot). Caddy: Built-in. Caddy wins here.
Are there alternatives to consider beyond Apache and Caddy?
nginx if you need maximum performance at scale and don't mind manual cert management.
Caddy wins for most modern deployments. Automatic HTTPS out of the box, a config file a human can actually read, and sane defaults. Apache is the battle-tested giant but its configuration is a tax you pay forever.
Related Comparisons
Disagree? nice@nicepick.dev