Dynamic

Ape Framework vs Brownie

Python's answer to smart contract development meets python's answer to ethereum development. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Ape Framework

Python's answer to smart contract development. All the blockchain headaches, now with fewer excuses.

Ape Framework

Nice Pick

Python's answer to smart contract development. All the blockchain headaches, now with fewer excuses.

Pros

  • +Leverages Python's ecosystem for testing and tooling
  • +Modular plugin system for custom workflows
  • +Built-in support for multiple EVM-compatible chains
  • +Integrated project management and contract compilation

Cons

  • -Python dependency hell can creep in
  • -Still requires deep blockchain knowledge despite the abstraction

Brownie

Python's answer to Ethereum development. All the smart contract power, none of the JavaScript fatigue.

Pros

  • +Python-based scripting makes contract interaction intuitive for Python devs
  • +Built-in support for Ganache and Web3.py streamlines local testing
  • +Automates compilation and deployment, reducing boilerplate code

Cons

  • -Limited ecosystem compared to JavaScript-based tools like Hardhat
  • -Can be slower for large projects due to Python's overhead

The Verdict

Use Ape Framework if: You want leverages python's ecosystem for testing and tooling and can live with python dependency hell can creep in.

Use Brownie if: You prioritize python-based scripting makes contract interaction intuitive for python devs over what Ape Framework offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Ape Framework wins

Python's answer to smart contract development. All the blockchain headaches, now with fewer excuses.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev