API 17d vs Flutter
Developers should learn about API 17d when maintaining or updating legacy Android apps that target older devices, as it represents a significant milestone in Android's evolution with over 95% device coverage at its peak meets flutter is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.
API 17d
Developers should learn about API 17d when maintaining or updating legacy Android apps that target older devices, as it represents a significant milestone in Android's evolution with over 95% device coverage at its peak
API 17d
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about API 17d when maintaining or updating legacy Android apps that target older devices, as it represents a significant milestone in Android's evolution with over 95% device coverage at its peak
Pros
- +It is crucial for ensuring backward compatibility, testing app behavior on older Android versions, and understanding the historical context of Android development, especially for apps with a broad user base
- +Related to: android-sdk, java
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Flutter
Flutter is widely used in the industry and worth learning
Pros
- +Widely used in the industry
- +Related to: dart, mobile
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. API 17d is a platform while Flutter is a framework. We picked API 17d based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. API 17d is more widely used, but Flutter excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev