API-Based Tools vs Manual Testing

Developers should learn and use API-based tools to efficiently manage API lifecycle, ensure reliability through testing, and accelerate development by automating integrations meets developers should learn manual testing to gain a user-centric perspective on software quality, catch edge cases early in development, and perform exploratory testing where automation is impractical. Here's our take.

API-Based Tools

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use API-based tools to efficiently manage API lifecycle, ensure reliability through testing, and accelerate development by automating integrations

Pros

• They are essential in modern software ecosystems for building microservices, implementing third-party services, and creating seamless user experiences, particularly in cloud-native and distributed applications
• Related to: rest-api, graphql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Testing

Developers should learn manual testing to gain a user-centric perspective on software quality, catch edge cases early in development, and perform exploratory testing where automation is impractical

Pros

• It's particularly valuable for usability testing, ad-hoc bug hunting, and validating new features before investing in automation scripts, helping ensure software meets real-world expectations and reducing post-release issues
• Related to: test-planning, bug-reporting

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. API-Based Tools is a tool while Manual Testing is a methodology. We picked API-Based Tools based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

API-Based Tools wins

Based on overall popularity. API-Based Tools is more widely used, but Manual Testing excels in its own space.