Apollo Federation vs Hasura

Developers should use Apollo Federation when building large-scale applications with multiple teams or services that need to expose a unified GraphQL API meets developers should use hasura when they need to rapidly prototype or build applications with graphql apis, especially for projects requiring real-time features like live queries or subscriptions. Here's our take.

Apollo Federation

Nice Pick

Developers should use Apollo Federation when building large-scale applications with multiple teams or services that need to expose a unified GraphQL API

Pros

• It is ideal for microservices environments where different services own specific data domains, as it enables schema composition and query planning across services
• Related to: graphql, apollo-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Hasura

Developers should use Hasura when they need to rapidly prototype or build applications with GraphQL APIs, especially for projects requiring real-time features like live queries or subscriptions

Pros

• It's ideal for startups, MVPs, or teams looking to accelerate development by leveraging existing PostgreSQL databases without extensive backend coding
• Related to: graphql, postgresql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Apollo Federation is a framework while Hasura is a platform. We picked Apollo Federation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Apollo Federation wins

Based on overall popularity. Apollo Federation is more widely used, but Hasura excels in its own space.