Application Load Balancing vs Classic Load Balancing
Developers should learn and use Application Load Balancing when building scalable, highly available web applications, especially in cloud-based or microservices architectures, as it handles traffic spikes, prevents server overload, and provides seamless failover during outages meets developers should learn classic load balancing when working with legacy aws environments or applications that rely on its specific features, such as tcp/ssl load balancing or integration with ec2-classic networks. Here's our take.
Application Load Balancing
Developers should learn and use Application Load Balancing when building scalable, highly available web applications, especially in cloud-based or microservices architectures, as it handles traffic spikes, prevents server overload, and provides seamless failover during outages
Application Load Balancing
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use Application Load Balancing when building scalable, highly available web applications, especially in cloud-based or microservices architectures, as it handles traffic spikes, prevents server overload, and provides seamless failover during outages
Pros
- +It is essential for applications requiring features like HTTP/HTTPS routing, session persistence, or integration with auto-scaling groups, such as e-commerce sites, APIs, and content delivery networks, to maintain performance and reliability under varying loads
- +Related to: aws-elastic-load-balancing, nginx
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Classic Load Balancing
Developers should learn Classic Load Balancing when working with legacy AWS environments or applications that rely on its specific features, such as TCP/SSL load balancing or integration with EC2-Classic networks
Pros
- +It is useful for scenarios where minimal configuration and cost-effectiveness are priorities, but it lacks the advanced capabilities of newer services like Application Load Balancer (ALB) or Network Load Balancer (NLB)
- +Related to: aws-application-load-balancer, aws-network-load-balancer
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Application Load Balancing if: You want it is essential for applications requiring features like http/https routing, session persistence, or integration with auto-scaling groups, such as e-commerce sites, apis, and content delivery networks, to maintain performance and reliability under varying loads and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Classic Load Balancing if: You prioritize it is useful for scenarios where minimal configuration and cost-effectiveness are priorities, but it lacks the advanced capabilities of newer services like application load balancer (alb) or network load balancer (nlb) over what Application Load Balancing offers.
Developers should learn and use Application Load Balancing when building scalable, highly available web applications, especially in cloud-based or microservices architectures, as it handles traffic spikes, prevents server overload, and provides seamless failover during outages
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev