Application Performance Management vs Infrastructure Monitoring

Developers should learn APM to proactively detect and resolve performance issues before they impact users, which is critical for maintaining high-quality, scalable applications in production meets developers should learn infrastructure monitoring to build resilient, scalable applications and participate in devops/sre practices. Here's our take.

Application Performance Management

Nice Pick

Developers should learn APM to proactively detect and resolve performance issues before they impact users, which is critical for maintaining high-quality, scalable applications in production

Pros

• It is especially valuable in microservices architectures, cloud-native deployments, and DevOps workflows where complex dependencies require comprehensive monitoring
• Related to: monitoring, observability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Infrastructure Monitoring

Developers should learn infrastructure monitoring to build resilient, scalable applications and participate in DevOps/SRE practices

Pros

• It's essential for troubleshooting production issues, capacity planning, and ensuring high availability in microservices or cloud-native architectures
• Related to: observability, apm-application-performance-monitoring

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Application Performance Management is a methodology while Infrastructure Monitoring is a concept. We picked Application Performance Management based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Application Performance Management wins

Based on overall popularity. Application Performance Management is more widely used, but Infrastructure Monitoring excels in its own space.