Dynamic
Appwrite vs Supabase Auth
Open-source Firebase alternative that actually lets you self-host without selling your soul to a cloud provider meets free with supabase. Here's our take.
π§Nice Pick
Supabase Auth
Free with Supabase. Good enough for most apps.
Appwrite
Open-source Firebase alternative that actually lets you self-host without selling your soul to a cloud provider.
Pros
- +Fully open-source with self-hosting on Docker for complete control
- +Built-in authentication, databases, storage, and real-time features in one package
- +RESTful and GraphQL APIs with auto-generated SDKs for multiple languages
- +No vendor lock-inβmigrate away anytime without rewriting your app
Cons
- -Self-hosting requires DevOps skills and ongoing maintenance
- -Less polished UI and documentation compared to commercial giants like Firebase
- -Community support can be slower than paid enterprise options
Supabase Auth
Nice PickFree with Supabase. Good enough for most apps.
Pros
- +Free
- +Integrated with Supabase
- +Row-level security
- +Social logins
Cons
- -Less polished UI
- -Fewer features
- -Tied to Supabase
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Appwrite is a hosting & deployment while Supabase Auth is a authentication. We picked Supabase Auth based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
π§
The Bottom Line
Supabase Auth wins
Based on overall popularity. Supabase Auth is more widely used, but Appwrite excels in its own space.
Related Comparisons
Clerk vs Supabase Auth β When to Pay for Polish vs Build with Batteries
Nice Pick: Clerk
Firebase vs Appwrite β Google's Giant vs the Open-Source Upstart
Nice Pick: Appwrite
PocketBase vs Appwrite β The Backend Battle You Can't Afford to Lose
Nice Pick: PocketBase
Supabase vs Appwrite
Nice Pick: Supabase
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev