Argon2 vs PBKDF2

Developers should use Argon2 when implementing secure password storage in applications, as it provides strong protection against brute-force and side-channel attacks meets developers should learn and use pbkdf2 when implementing password storage or key derivation in applications that require secure handling of user credentials, such as authentication systems, encryption tools, or data protection mechanisms. Here's our take.

Argon2

Nice Pick

Developers should use Argon2 when implementing secure password storage in applications, as it provides strong protection against brute-force and side-channel attacks

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in web applications, authentication systems, and any scenario where user credentials need long-term protection, such as in databases or authentication servers
• Related to: password-hashing, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

PBKDF2

Developers should learn and use PBKDF2 when implementing password storage or key derivation in applications that require secure handling of user credentials, such as authentication systems, encryption tools, or data protection mechanisms

Pros

• It is particularly useful in scenarios where passwords need to be hashed with added resistance to dictionary and rainbow table attacks, as recommended by security standards like NIST for password-based key derivation
• Related to: cryptography, password-hashing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Argon2 is a tool while PBKDF2 is a concept. We picked Argon2 based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Argon2 wins

Based on overall popularity. Argon2 is more widely used, but PBKDF2 excels in its own space.