Argon2 vs Scrypt

Developers should use Argon2 when implementing secure password storage in applications, as it provides strong protection against brute-force and side-channel attacks meets developers should learn and use scrypt when they need to securely hash passwords or derive keys in environments where resistance to hardware-accelerated attacks is critical, such as in cryptocurrency mining, password authentication systems, or any application handling sensitive user credentials. Here's our take.

Argon2

Nice Pick

Developers should use Argon2 when implementing secure password storage in applications, as it provides strong protection against brute-force and side-channel attacks

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in web applications, authentication systems, and any scenario where user credentials need long-term protection, such as in databases or authentication servers
• Related to: password-hashing, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Scrypt

Developers should learn and use Scrypt when they need to securely hash passwords or derive keys in environments where resistance to hardware-accelerated attacks is critical, such as in cryptocurrency mining, password authentication systems, or any application handling sensitive user credentials

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in scenarios where attackers might use custom hardware, as its memory-intensive design increases the cost and difficulty of parallel attacks compared to simpler hash functions
• Related to: password-hashing, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Argon2 is a tool while Scrypt is a concept. We picked Argon2 based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Argon2 wins

Based on overall popularity. Argon2 is more widely used, but Scrypt excels in its own space.