Arm Architecture vs x86 Architecture

Developers should learn Arm Architecture when working on mobile applications (iOS/Android), embedded systems (IoT devices, automotive), or cloud/server environments using Arm-based processors like AWS Graviton or Apple Silicon meets developers should learn x86 architecture when working on low-level systems programming, operating system development, embedded systems, or performance-critical applications where direct hardware interaction is required. Here's our take.

Arm Architecture

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Arm Architecture when working on mobile applications (iOS/Android), embedded systems (IoT devices, automotive), or cloud/server environments using Arm-based processors like AWS Graviton or Apple Silicon

Pros

• It is essential for low-level programming, system design, and optimizing performance and power consumption in energy-constrained devices
• Related to: arm-assembly, embedded-systems

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

x86 Architecture

Developers should learn x86 architecture when working on low-level systems programming, operating system development, embedded systems, or performance-critical applications where direct hardware interaction is required

Pros

• It is essential for understanding how software executes on most desktop and server hardware, enabling optimization, debugging, and writing assembly code or device drivers
• Related to: assembly-language, computer-architecture

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Arm Architecture is a platform while x86 Architecture is a concept. We picked Arm Architecture based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Arm Architecture wins

Based on overall popularity. Arm Architecture is more widely used, but x86 Architecture excels in its own space.