Astro vs Cro

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys meets raku's answer to async chaos. Here's our take.

Astro

Nice Pick

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.

Pros

• Zero JavaScript by default for lightning-fast static sites
• Mix and match React, Vue, or Svelte components without framework lock-in
• Excellent SEO and performance out of the box
• Built-in support for islands architecture for partial hydration

Cons

• Can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach
• Limited real-time interactivity without manual JavaScript additions

Cro

Raku's answer to async chaos. Build reactive APIs without the callback hell.

Pros

• Leverages Raku's built-in concurrency for high-performance I/O
• Strong type safety and composability for scalable network services
• Excellent support for real-time features like WebSocket servers

Cons

• Limited ecosystem compared to mainstream frameworks like Node.js or Go
• Requires familiarity with Raku, which has a niche adoption

The Verdict

Use Astro if: You want zero javascript by default for lightning-fast static sites and can live with can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach.

Use Cro if: You prioritize leverages raku's built-in concurrency for high-performance i/o over what Astro offers.

The Bottom Line

Astro wins

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.