Astro vs Ruby on Rails

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys meets the framework that makes you feel like a productivity wizard, until you realize you're just following the magic. Here's our take.

Astro

Nice Pick

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.

Pros

• Zero JavaScript by default for lightning-fast static sites
• Mix and match React, Vue, or Svelte components without framework lock-in
• Excellent SEO and performance out of the box
• Built-in support for islands architecture for partial hydration

Cons

• Can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach
• Limited real-time interactivity without manual JavaScript additions

Ruby on Rails

The framework that makes you feel like a productivity wizard, until you realize you're just following the magic.

Pros

• Convention over configuration means less boilerplate code
• Built-in tools like ActiveRecord and ActionCable for rapid development
• Strong community support and extensive gem ecosystem

Cons

• Can feel bloated for small projects or microservices
• Performance can lag behind newer frameworks in high-throughput scenarios

The Verdict

Use Astro if: You want zero javascript by default for lightning-fast static sites and can live with can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach.

Use Ruby on Rails if: You prioritize convention over configuration means less boilerplate code over what Astro offers.

The Bottom Line

Astro wins

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.