Dynamic

Auth0 vs Appwrite

The identity-as-a-service darling that makes auth easy until you hit the enterprise pricing wall meets open-source firebase alternative that actually lets you self-host without selling your soul to a cloud provider. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Auth0

The identity-as-a-service darling that makes auth easy until you hit the enterprise pricing wall.

Auth0

Nice Pick

The identity-as-a-service darling that makes auth easy until you hit the enterprise pricing wall.

Pros

  • +Enterprise features
  • +Many integrations
  • +Mature
  • +Customizable
  • +Quick setup with pre-built login UIs and social logins
  • +Handles complex protocols like OAuth 2.0 and SAML out-of-the-box
  • +Scalable for startups to large applications with minimal dev effort

Cons

  • -Complex
  • -Expensive
  • -Overkill for small apps
  • -Pricing can skyrocket with user counts and advanced features
  • -Customization beyond basics often requires wrestling with their rules engine

Appwrite

Open-source Firebase alternative that actually lets you self-host without selling your soul to a cloud provider.

Pros

  • +Fully open-source with self-hosting on Docker for complete control
  • +Built-in authentication, databases, storage, and real-time features in one package
  • +RESTful and GraphQL APIs with auto-generated SDKs for multiple languages
  • +No vendor lock-in—migrate away anytime without rewriting your app

Cons

  • -Self-hosting requires DevOps skills and ongoing maintenance
  • -Less polished UI and documentation compared to commercial giants like Firebase
  • -Community support can be slower than paid enterprise options

The Verdict

Use Auth0 if: You want enterprise features and can live with complex.

Use Appwrite if: You prioritize fully open-source with self-hosting on docker for complete control over what Auth0 offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Auth0 wins

The identity-as-a-service darling that makes auth easy until you hit the enterprise pricing wall.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev