Authenticated Encryption vs Unauthenticated Encryption

Developers should use Authenticated Encryption when handling sensitive data that requires both privacy and integrity, such as in secure communications (e meets developers should learn about unauthenticated encryption to understand its limitations and avoid using it in security-critical applications where data integrity is required, such as in financial transactions or secure communications. Here's our take.

Authenticated Encryption

Nice Pick

Developers should use Authenticated Encryption when handling sensitive data that requires both privacy and integrity, such as in secure communications (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: cryptography, symmetric-encryption

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Unauthenticated Encryption

Developers should learn about unauthenticated encryption to understand its limitations and avoid using it in security-critical applications where data integrity is required, such as in financial transactions or secure communications

Pros

• It is primarily used in legacy systems or specific scenarios where confidentiality alone is sufficient, but modern best practices strongly recommend authenticated encryption instead
• Related to: authenticated-encryption, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Authenticated Encryption if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Unauthenticated Encryption if: You prioritize it is primarily used in legacy systems or specific scenarios where confidentiality alone is sufficient, but modern best practices strongly recommend authenticated encryption instead over what Authenticated Encryption offers.

The Bottom Line

Authenticated Encryption wins

Developers should use Authenticated Encryption when handling sensitive data that requires both privacy and integrity, such as in secure communications (e