Automated Accessibility Testing vs Accessibility Testing
Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e meets developers should learn and use accessibility testing to build products that are legally compliant (e. Here's our take.
Automated Accessibility Testing
Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e
Automated Accessibility Testing
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-compliance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Accessibility Testing
Developers should learn and use accessibility testing to build products that are legally compliant (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, assistive-technologies
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Automated Accessibility Testing if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Accessibility Testing if: You prioritize g over what Automated Accessibility Testing offers.
Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev