Automated Input vs Low Code Platforms

Developers should learn Automated Input to streamline testing processes, such as in automated UI testing for web or desktop applications, ensuring consistent and repeatable test scenarios meets developers should learn low code platforms to accelerate prototyping, automate repetitive tasks, and enable collaboration with business stakeholders who lack coding expertise. Here's our take.

Automated Input

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Automated Input to streamline testing processes, such as in automated UI testing for web or desktop applications, ensuring consistent and repeatable test scenarios

Pros

• It is also valuable for automating data entry tasks, like populating forms or migrating data between systems, which saves time and minimizes manual effort in development and operational workflows
• Related to: selenium, puppeteer

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Low Code Platforms

Developers should learn low code platforms to accelerate prototyping, automate repetitive tasks, and enable collaboration with business stakeholders who lack coding expertise

Pros

• They are particularly useful for building internal tools, business process applications, and MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) where speed and agility are prioritized over custom code
• Related to: business-process-automation, drag-and-drop-interfaces

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Automated Input is a tool while Low Code Platforms is a platform. We picked Automated Input based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Automated Input wins

Based on overall popularity. Automated Input is more widely used, but Low Code Platforms excels in its own space.