Automated Security Scanning vs Penetration Testing

Developers should use automated security scanning to integrate security into their DevOps workflows (DevSecOps), ensuring continuous security assessment throughout development and deployment meets developers should learn penetration testing to build more secure software by understanding how attackers think and operate, enabling them to design and code with security in mind from the start. Here's our take.

Automated Security Scanning

Nice Pick

Developers should use automated security scanning to integrate security into their DevOps workflows (DevSecOps), ensuring continuous security assessment throughout development and deployment

Pros

• It is critical for compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, and for preventing costly breaches in production environments by catching vulnerabilities in code, containers, APIs, or infrastructure as code (IaC)
• Related to: static-application-security-testing, dynamic-application-security-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Penetration Testing

Developers should learn penetration testing to build more secure software by understanding how attackers think and operate, enabling them to design and code with security in mind from the start

Pros

• It is crucial for roles in cybersecurity, DevOps (e
• Related to: cybersecurity, vulnerability-assessment

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Automated Security Scanning is a tool while Penetration Testing is a methodology. We picked Automated Security Scanning based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Automated Security Scanning wins

Based on overall popularity. Automated Security Scanning is more widely used, but Penetration Testing excels in its own space.