Automation Scripting vs Manual Execution

Developers should learn automation scripting to streamline routine operations, such as automating builds, testing, or deployments in CI/CD pipelines, which enhances productivity and consistency meets developers should learn manual execution to conduct initial testing phases, validate user interfaces, and perform ad-hoc or exploratory testing where automation scripts cannot easily replicate human intuition and context. Here's our take.

Automation Scripting

Nice Pick

Developers should learn automation scripting to streamline routine operations, such as automating builds, testing, or deployments in CI/CD pipelines, which enhances productivity and consistency

Pros

• It is essential for tasks like log analysis, backup processes, or environment setup, where manual execution is tedious and error-prone
• Related to: python, bash-scripting

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Execution

Developers should learn manual execution to conduct initial testing phases, validate user interfaces, and perform ad-hoc or exploratory testing where automation scripts cannot easily replicate human intuition and context

Pros

• It is particularly useful for usability testing, accessibility checks, and verifying edge cases in complex or frequently changing applications, ensuring software meets real-world user expectations before investing in automation
• Related to: test-automation, exploratory-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Automation Scripting is a concept while Manual Execution is a methodology. We picked Automation Scripting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Automation Scripting wins

Based on overall popularity. Automation Scripting is more widely used, but Manual Execution excels in its own space.