Dynamic

Autotools vs Bazel

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD meets developers should learn and use bazel when working on large-scale, multi-language projects that require fast, incremental builds and consistent results across different environments, such as in monorepos or distributed systems. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Autotools

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD

Autotools

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD

Pros

  • +It is essential for ensuring portability and handling system-specific differences, like library versions or compiler options, making it a standard in many legacy and open-source software builds
  • +Related to: make, cmake

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Bazel

Developers should learn and use Bazel when working on large-scale, multi-language projects that require fast, incremental builds and consistent results across different environments, such as in monorepos or distributed systems

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable for teams needing reproducible builds, efficient dependency management, and support for languages like Java, C++, Python, and Go, as it reduces build times through advanced caching and parallel execution
  • +Related to: starlark, build-automation

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Autotools if: You want it is essential for ensuring portability and handling system-specific differences, like library versions or compiler options, making it a standard in many legacy and open-source software builds and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Bazel if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable for teams needing reproducible builds, efficient dependency management, and support for languages like java, c++, python, and go, as it reduces build times through advanced caching and parallel execution over what Autotools offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Autotools wins

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev