Dynamic

Autotools vs CMake

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD meets developers should learn cmake when working on c, c++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Autotools

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD

Autotools

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD

Pros

  • +It is essential for ensuring portability and handling system-specific differences, like library versions or compiler options, making it a standard in many legacy and open-source software builds
  • +Related to: make, cmake

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CMake

Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: c-plus-plus, make

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Autotools if: You want it is essential for ensuring portability and handling system-specific differences, like library versions or compiler options, making it a standard in many legacy and open-source software builds and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use CMake if: You prioritize g over what Autotools offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Autotools wins

Developers should learn Autotools when working on C/C++ projects that need to be distributed as source code and compiled on various Unix-like systems, such as Linux, macOS, or BSD

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev