AWS API Gateway vs Kong
Developers should use AWS API Gateway when building serverless applications, microservices architectures, or exposing backend services as RESTful or WebSocket APIs, as it simplifies API management, integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Lambda and DynamoDB, and provides built-in features for security, caching, and throttling meets developers should learn kong when building or managing microservices-based applications that require scalable api management, security, and observability. Here's our take.
AWS API Gateway
Developers should use AWS API Gateway when building serverless applications, microservices architectures, or exposing backend services as RESTful or WebSocket APIs, as it simplifies API management, integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Lambda and DynamoDB, and provides built-in features for security, caching, and throttling
AWS API Gateway
Nice PickDevelopers should use AWS API Gateway when building serverless applications, microservices architectures, or exposing backend services as RESTful or WebSocket APIs, as it simplifies API management, integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Lambda and DynamoDB, and provides built-in features for security, caching, and throttling
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable for scenarios requiring scalable API endpoints, such as mobile backends, IoT applications, or public-facing web services, where it reduces operational overhead by handling infrastructure concerns automatically
- +Related to: aws-lambda, serverless-architecture
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Kong
Developers should learn Kong when building or managing microservices-based applications that require scalable API management, security, and observability
Pros
- +It is particularly useful in distributed systems where multiple services need unified access control, traffic routing, and performance monitoring, such as in e-commerce platforms or SaaS products
- +Related to: api-gateway, microservices
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use AWS API Gateway if: You want it is particularly valuable for scenarios requiring scalable api endpoints, such as mobile backends, iot applications, or public-facing web services, where it reduces operational overhead by handling infrastructure concerns automatically and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Kong if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in distributed systems where multiple services need unified access control, traffic routing, and performance monitoring, such as in e-commerce platforms or saas products over what AWS API Gateway offers.
Developers should use AWS API Gateway when building serverless applications, microservices architectures, or exposing backend services as RESTful or WebSocket APIs, as it simplifies API management, integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Lambda and DynamoDB, and provides built-in features for security, caching, and throttling
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev