AWS Certificate Manager vs Comodo SSL

Developers should use ACM when deploying web applications on AWS that require HTTPS encryption, as it eliminates the manual overhead of purchasing, uploading, and renewing certificates from third-party authorities meets developers should use comodo ssl certificates when deploying websites or applications that require secure data transmission, such as e-commerce platforms, banking sites, or any service handling user personal information. Here's our take.

AWS Certificate Manager

Nice Pick

Developers should use ACM when deploying web applications on AWS that require HTTPS encryption, as it eliminates the manual overhead of purchasing, uploading, and renewing certificates from third-party authorities

Pros

• It is ideal for use cases involving load balancers, content delivery networks (CloudFront), or APIs where security and automation are priorities, such as e-commerce sites, SaaS platforms, or microservices architectures
• Related to: aws-elastic-load-balancing, amazon-cloudfront

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Comodo SSL

Developers should use Comodo SSL certificates when deploying websites or applications that require secure data transmission, such as e-commerce platforms, banking sites, or any service handling user personal information

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for meeting compliance standards like PCI DSS and building trust with users by displaying security indicators like padlock icons in browsers
• Related to: ssl-tls, https

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. AWS Certificate Manager is a platform while Comodo SSL is a tool. We picked AWS Certificate Manager based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

AWS Certificate Manager wins

Based on overall popularity. AWS Certificate Manager is more widely used, but Comodo SSL excels in its own space.