AWS NAT Gateway vs AWS NAT Instance

Developers should use AWS NAT Gateway when building secure VPC architectures where private instances (e meets developers should use aws nat instance when they need to provide internet access to private instances in a vpc for tasks like software updates, external api calls, or downloading packages, while maintaining security by keeping those instances isolated from direct internet exposure. Here's our take.

AWS NAT Gateway

Nice Pick

Developers should use AWS NAT Gateway when building secure VPC architectures where private instances (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: aws-vpc, aws-ec2

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

AWS NAT Instance

Developers should use AWS NAT Instance when they need to provide internet access to private instances in a VPC for tasks like software updates, external API calls, or downloading packages, while maintaining security by keeping those instances isolated from direct internet exposure

Pros

• It is particularly useful in scenarios where fine-grained control over NAT configuration is required, such as custom routing or integration with specific security groups, though AWS now recommends NAT Gateway for most use cases due to its managed nature and higher availability
• Related to: aws-vpc, aws-nat-gateway

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use AWS NAT Gateway if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use AWS NAT Instance if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in scenarios where fine-grained control over nat configuration is required, such as custom routing or integration with specific security groups, though aws now recommends nat gateway for most use cases due to its managed nature and higher availability over what AWS NAT Gateway offers.

The Bottom Line

AWS NAT Gateway wins

Developers should use AWS NAT Gateway when building secure VPC architectures where private instances (e