Azure API Management vs Kong

Developers should use Azure API Management when building microservices architectures, exposing internal APIs to external partners, or managing API lifecycle in cloud-native applications meets developers should learn kong when building or managing microservices-based applications that require scalable api management, security, and observability. Here's our take.

Azure API Management

Nice Pick

Developers should use Azure API Management when building microservices architectures, exposing internal APIs to external partners, or managing API lifecycle in cloud-native applications

Pros

• It is essential for scenarios requiring API security (e
• Related to: azure-functions, azure-logic-apps

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Kong

Developers should learn Kong when building or managing microservices-based applications that require scalable API management, security, and observability

Pros

• It is particularly useful in distributed systems where multiple services need unified access control, traffic routing, and performance monitoring, such as in e-commerce platforms or SaaS products
• Related to: api-gateway, microservices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Azure API Management if: You want it is essential for scenarios requiring api security (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Kong if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in distributed systems where multiple services need unified access control, traffic routing, and performance monitoring, such as in e-commerce platforms or saas products over what Azure API Management offers.

The Bottom Line

Azure API Management wins

Developers should use Azure API Management when building microservices architectures, exposing internal APIs to external partners, or managing API lifecycle in cloud-native applications